On April 13th, we started collecting #1d4d tweets.
(There’s a whole database sitting on Phong’s computer. It’s so pretty.)The premise of “One Day for Design” to engage designers in a global conversation is a great one. It generated a waterfall of thoughts, ideas and opinions. The drawback to a waterfall, however, is that it’s hard to just take a sip.
Here’s a few glassfuls of data to nerd on out.
*(Analysis based on an incomplete dataset. Phong was Midwest-sleeping when the East coast was already twittering and bagel’ing.)Let’s start off with the usual. 3,137 unique tweeters in our sample size. The long tail stands: 66% of those tweeters posted only one tweet. Nearly 90% still only posted less than five things. (That includes posts that were retweets.)
If we flip to the other end, here’s the top 20 talkers:
| @KylerBH | 100 | @TinaMMcPherson | 97 | @sryanvsa | 80 | @JulySky20 | 77 |
| @anitaycheng | 75 | @mrdavidhong | 61 | @TheSlush | 60 | @MATTER | 60 |
| @natalka01 | 49 | @sewCLVR | 44 | @tonyloco | 42 | @Gelatobaby | 40 |
| @erinmharris | 39 | @nukketdesigner | 39 | @CreativeVortex | 38 | @hlocke20 | 37 |
| @mmarosz | 36 | @vintageneon | 35 | @AIGAcsu | 34 | @chgraphics | 34 |
Whether a tweet was mentioning or replying to someone, all-in-all — 8,867 @replies were used. Interestingly, only 1,334 unique elite were mentioned. At the top of the jungle gym is Pentagram with 789.
| @pentagramdesign | 789 | @onedayfordesign | 527 | @stop | 309 | @ucllc | 294 |
| @espiekermann | 247 | @debbiemillman | 222 | @bobulate | 195 | @signalnoise | 173 |
| @bogusky | 168 | @gelatobaby | 145 | @kkwalker | 129 | @zeldman | 126 |
| @Draplin | 125 | @MATTER | 119 | @mlhdesigner | 115 | @sryanvsa | 72 |
| @AIGAdesign | 68 | @cherylyau | 65 | @LogoMotives | 59 | @JulySky20 | 53 |
I’m fascinated by the contrast of the retweet-ed versus the retweet-ers. Namely the relationship between those who talk versus those who distribute. In this sample, it trends towards two separate groups of people with a few exceptions. Those exceptions are highlighted.
Top Retweeted People |
|
|---|---|
| pentagramdesign | 758 |
| espiekermann | 205 |
| onedayfordesign | 179 |
| signalnoise | 167 |
| zeldman | 118 |
| bobulate | 116 |
| ucllc | 112 |
| mlhdesigner | 111 |
| Draplin | 105 |
| stop | 103 |
| debbiemillman | 90 |
| bogusky | 84 |
| cherylyau | 61 |
| gelatobaby | 58 |
| kkwalker | 50 |
| AIGAdesign | 44 |
| MATTER | 39 |
| LogoMotives | 38 |
| davidairey | 35 |
| vintageneon | 34 |
Top Retweeters |
|
|---|---|
| nukketdesigner | 30 |
| gelatobaby | 30 |
| MATTER | 28 |
| mmarosz | 26 |
| PrixMadonna | 25 |
| CreativeVortex | 25 |
| _ami_d | 24 |
| jbchaykowsky | 23 |
| KylerBH | 20 |
| sudice | 19 |
| Madelinnie | 19 |
| TinaMMcPherson | 18 |
| mrdavidhong | 16 |
| suedecrush | 16 |
| kaishinchu | 15 |
| FreeSpkr | 13 |
| penhousedesign | 12 |
| andrettibrown | 12 |
| debbiemillman | 12 |
| hayley_g | 11 |
These aren’t the most retweeted posts, but rather of the top people retweeted: these are some of their most popular posts.
“If you can’t find a solution, you haven’t found the problem.” John McConnell
designers take things apart, evaluate them & put them back together, in a different order. that is how we understand product & process
@bogusky Art is from the heart, Design is from the head. My version: Design is for others, art for yourself
“Don’t worry about people stealing your design work. Worry about the day they stop.”
Good ideas come from extended aimless walks.
Bad ideas come from Google images
Final thought: Keep doing what you do, do it for love or survival, for pride or money, but always design and think the hell out of it.
Designers now seek and find physical and virtual community in many places that didn’t exist 20 years ago.
We can tweet about making a difference,
we can make a difference or we can do both.
Does the AIGA do enough to support digital design professionals?
Something I wish we’d talked more about today: Should designers be responsible for creating social change?
Sounds like most design programs don’t give would-be designers the right biz-savvy tools to compete in the mrktplace. AIGA must help.
DDC1716:
Every single thing on the page is there for a reason. And line that shit up.
Worse than a client who does not value the efforts of a graphic designer, is a designer who doesn’t value of their own time and work.
It’s a good thing for designers that Photoshop is difficult, because everyone with MS Word thinks they are a writer
Fairly straightforward data here. Perhaps most interesting is which hashtags make sense on-their-own versus needing context. Also, figuring out which is an inside joke or just spam.
This is what gets my motor running. Linguistical breakdowns. First up, is tracking all the question marks (the cat), the exclamations points (the bang) and the ellipses (the hesitant) are.
The other terminal punctuation mark is the period with 8,645 (excluding those poor trios used as ellipses…) Making for a total of 11,959 not counting their comma-colon cousins.
And don’t think the 64 em dashes went unnoticed, you cheeky designers.At the end of the day, this was more of an exercise rather than a robust statistical analysis. I’ll leave that to those took the time to learn what ‘regressions’ actually mean. However, I won’t discount the fact that the main impetus was actually the criticism the event got. It’s true that Twitter wasn’t the best medium to converse about very fundamental issues of our industry.
However that said, the burden of discourse has always been on ourselves. Whereas, the medium may have fell short in cohesiveness: the opportunist, the creative, the designer in us surely see the potential in 30,000 tweets by 3,900 people (numbers from onedayfordesign.org). It’s our job to process, to produce something constructive, to start that very conversation.
At our most self-deprecating, we make pretty things, but our best — we make.
—Phong
Share this data-goodness on the twitters and/or the facebooks.
If you’re interested in a brief technical breakdown of this infographic, read it on our fb page.